Definition of Art Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Definition of Art - Essay ExampleIt communicates not solitary(prenominal) the inventionist ideas but also its emotion. It is largely based and facilitated more by intuition than reason as the receiver is more dependent on the survive and feeling evoked by the artistic creation. While art can be interpreted by logical reasoning as what was impressed to the spectator, the experience, however, is still inwrought and relative to the interpretation of the receiver. Such, while the intellectual faculty is stimulated by the impression of a particular art form, it still appeals largely on emotion. And contradictory the Scientific subject, art is generally organized in accordance with the technique or medium rather than the specialization of knowledge. Artistic technique refers to the degree of volubility of the artist in rendering the art through a medium. For example, with regard to its classification according to the medium, art can be categorized as the execute arts or literature. With regard to other media such as the material or component in rendering the artistic by-product, it can also be classified as painting in reference to the medium of paint of rendering the artistic impression. Art also requires a loftier sense of ability or mastery of its medium. It can be the well-versed articulation and adept use of a language to impart meaning and substance that moves the readers. That mastery of the language, whether it be the creative drift or the originality of the approach of rendering the thoughts, or a combination of the two, has been best exemplified by the works of William Shakespeare as it enables the reader to grasp his meaning while regurgitating the expressive style it was conveyed with words. The fluency of technical execution can also be construed as art and even a requirement as manifested in Leonardo da Vincis works. For art is subjective and relative to the experience of its viewers, making the judgment about its value can be difficult. The q uality or value of art is difficult to determine for the criteria of what makes good or bad art is also relative whether it is the technical fluency of the artist or the intent and impact of the art to its receiver determines a good or bad art is difficult to say. Perception differs from one person to another. But regardless of its subjectivity, it is commonly agreed that what is not aesthetically satisfying cannot be considered as an art. Aesthetic satisfaction is not only confined to beauty, however gory and horrible images that are intended for hearty or thought-provoking intention can also be considered as art although its prime motivation is not the aesthetic pursuit. The classic example to this would be Pablo Picassos Guemica (1937) In the twentieth century,where he utilized arresting cubisttechniques and unembellishedmonochromatic oils, to portray the dreadful result of a contemporary attack of a small, ancient Basque town. Even blasphemous rendering can still be considered as an art as exampled by Andres SerranosPiss Christ(1989) where a photograph of a cross which is considered holy to the Christian religion, depictedChrists sacrifice and final suffering in a manner that is immersed in the artists own urine.